Blog 5
To
analyze the terms and conditions of a social media platform, I used Instagram –
as something that I use more often than others. I will be analyzing the forms
as I viewed them, so I will begin with some initial thoughts when finding the
terms and conditions themselves. Initially, I searched for the forms on my phone
and was able to read through the terms of use. This starts out with a rather
harsh introduction of …
“YOU WAVE YOUR RIGHT TO
PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT”
… which is intimidating, to say
the least! I was immediately put off but dug deeper into the document to understand
how the company wanted to present themselves. Following the immediate reprimand,
the document turned to community guidelines and the mission statement of Instagram
which is, “to bring you closer to the people and things you love.” There was an
immediate change to the more colloquial language and positive messaging that I
appreciated more. The company was quick to mention their hope for positive and
inclusive environments with a specific emphasis on safety for all users. The front
page also made sure to discuss who can use the platform – with the main blocked
users being under the age of 13 and convicted sex offenders. To me, there are a
few more specifications that could have been made here with people who should
not be allowed on the platform with various felonies, known cyberbullying, or
others. It seems like there is a bit missing. In addition, there is no mention
of how to ensure that profiles are who they say they are – meaning that someone
who is a sex offender could still be on the platform using a pseudonym until
they are caught. The last piece on the main page focused on content ownership
with Instagram claiming the right to show information about someone’s content,
and permission to change usernames if they are deemed inappropriate. In the
same way, they claim that all rights not expressly mentioned are also reserved
for them. All of this was important information to keep on the front and was
were the phone version ended.
Switching
to the computer version, there were several more pages of information to scroll
through. Some of the important points in general about the writing are that
many of the pages had drop-down, simplified questions, or had a short and long
version to read through. I think that made the information a lot more accessible
than could be otherwise. The menus on the side emphasized different information
than I would have expected like abuse, blocking, parental information, reporting,
and eating disorders. In some way, I expected much more legal discussion more
than information regarding individual use and self-help. Clicking through
several of them leads to more discussion regarding the ‘community’ of Instagram,
which they seem intent on offering. One section I found interesting was a discussion
on nudity. As this has been a topic in the media, I was intrigued to read their
official take on the issue. Their statement centered around how full nudity is
equitable to a lack of respect and that meant women’s nipples and men and women’s
genitalia will be taken down by the company. They did, however, specify that mother’s
breastfeeding or paint renditions of either are able to be shared. The company
mentions a zero-tolerance policy for violating these guidelines, as well as the
immediate take-down of any child nudity for the safety of the children on what
could be a dangerous platform.
Another
drop-down menu emphasized eating disorders and messaging for helping those in
need. Instagram was intent on asking individuals to not glorify self-injury –
as this is known to push others to join in these actions. In a similar manner,
the eating disorders menu explained what an eating disorder is, what it can
appear like on Instagram, and dos and don’ts. This was a thought process I would
not have come up with prior to reading these conditions – I really appreciated
that the company is aware of some of the dangers of their platform and working
to combat it. The blocking and reporting system was also mentioned repeatedly
in different menus when connecting to safety. The repetition was helpful in
case someone was only seeking an answer for one thing and would need to know a
reporting method. The last main page I scrolled through was the parental guide.
I initially went to look because I thought it was a little bit funny but ended
up really liking what I found. Instagram made a point to make a specific page not
only explaining what the platform is but how to use it, how to talk to teens
about using the platform. These are all important pieces of information that
could have been indiscernible from simply using the site. A link with a more
in-depth guide to the site was shared as well, giving more opportunities for an
older generation to work with the company.
Overall,
I was impressed with Instagram. In relating it to our readings, while the
company did not specify women and girls in their menus, there were some clear aspects
that were mentioned for their safety. As “Instagram and Pinterest [are] the
most popular [platforms] used by girls” it is important to keep up to date on
the issues and necessary policies for their safety (Veha-Castandeda, and
Castaneda, 2019, p. 87). I specifically related to this, as my parents had
several conversations with me regarding my use of social media. On the other
hand, there are issues that were brought up with “very young girls who get
their parents or an older sampling to create accounts for them” which can cause
another side of issues in using a platform at too young of an age (Veha-Castandeda,
and Castaneda, 2019, p. 88). I think using their voice to display where the company
stands is a smart and successful move. I really don’t know if I would have
stopped using the platform if I did not like how they presented their terms but
with how they were able to emphasize safety and really explain all of their
main platform issues, I was impressed. I did not read the terms and conditions
when I joined initially, which is odd. My dad is a contract lawyer and, when
given a contract in person, I always try to read almost every line. Why is it
so much easier to click accept and move on? Even with my nerves, going into
this blog, Instagram used accessible language and ease of use to let their
audience really understand where the company stands.
Vega-Castaneda, L., & Castaneda, M. (2019). Teaching and
learning about difference through social media. Women and Girls and Social Media, 86–103. doi: 10.4324/9781351238212
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.